目前查詢
歷史查詢
Why trust science? /
- 館藏(1)
- 書目資訊
- 心得(0)
- 機讀格式
- 標籤
書名 ： Why trust science? /
紀錄類型 ： 書目-語言資料,印刷品: 單行本
正題名[資料類型標示]/作者 ： Why trust science? /Naomi Oreskes.
作者 ： Oreskes, Naomi.
出版者 ： Princeton, NJ :Princeton University Press,c2019.
面頁冊數 ： x, 360 p. ;23 cm.
內容註 ： Introduction / Stephen Macedo -- Why trust science? : perspectives from the history and philosophy of science -- Science awry -- Coda: Values in science -- Comments. The epistemology of frozen peas : innocence, violence, and everyday trust in twentieth-century science / Susan Lindee ; What would reasons for trusting science be? / Marc Lange ; Pascal's wager reframed : toward trustworthy climate policy assessments for risk societies / Ottmar Edenhofer and Martin Kowarsch ; Comments on the present and future of science, inspired by Naomi Oreskes / Jon A. Krosnick -- Response. Reply -- Afterword
標題 ： Science
ISBN ： 9780691179001
集叢項 ： University Center for Human Values series
發表心得
LEADER 02556cam a2200265 a 4500
001 1048719
008 200930s2019 njua b 001 0 eng
010 $a2019937193
020 $a9780691179001$q(hbk.) :$cNT$750
020 $a069117900X$q(hbk.)
035 $aNO000196336
037 $b公共圖書館臺南分區資源中心
040 $aYDX$beng$cYDX$dUKMGB$dOCLCO$dUPM$dJQM$dYAM$dOCLCF$dERASA$dATCDL$dVP@$dCHVBK$dOCLCO$dPSC$dOUN$dTNTNM$eaacr2
042 $apcc
050 4$aQ175.5$b.O75 2019
082 04$a501$222
090 $a臺南市立圖書館
100 1 $aOreskes, Naomi.
245 10$aWhy trust science? /$cNaomi Oreskes.
260 $aPrinceton, NJ :$bPrinceton University Press,$cc2019.
300 $ax, 360 p. ;$c23 cm.
490 1 $aUniversity Center for Human Values series
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references (pages [297]-334) and index.
505 0 $aIntroduction / Stephen Macedo -- Why trust science? : perspectives from the history and philosophy of science -- Science awry -- Coda: Values in science -- Comments. The epistemology of frozen peas : innocence, violence, and everyday trust in twentieth-century science / Susan Lindee ; What would reasons for trusting science be? / Marc Lange ; Pascal's wager reframed : toward trustworthy climate policy assessments for risk societies / Ottmar Edenhofer and Martin Kowarsch ; Comments on the present and future of science, inspired by Naomi Oreskes / Jon A. Krosnick -- Response. Reply -- Afterword
520 $a"Do doctors really know what they are talking about when they tell us vaccines are safe? Should we take climate experts at their word when they warn us about the perils of global warming? Why should we trust science when our own politicians don't? In this landmark book, Naomi Oreskes offers a bold and compelling defense of science, revealing why the social character of scientific knowledge is its greatest strength -- and the greatest reason we can trust it. Tracing the history and philosophy of science from the late nineteenth century to today, Oreskes explains that, contrary to popular belief, there is no single scientific method. Rather, the trustworthiness of scientific claims derives from the social process by which they are rigorously vetted. This process is not perfect -- nothing ever is when humans are involved -- but she draws vital lessons from cases where scientists got it wrong. Oreskes shows how consensus is a crucial indicator of when a scientific matter has been settled, and when the knowledge produced is likely to be trustworthy."--$cProvided by publisher.
650 0$aScience$xPhilosophy.
650 0$aScience$xSocial aspects.
653 $a科技創新
653 $a知識性
830 0$aUniversity Center for Human Values series.