目前查詢

歷史查詢

進階檢索

限制條件

在搜尋結果中查詢

出版年 :

至

分類法

資料類型 :

語言 :

館別

清除

關鍵字：神奇柑仔店 , 屁屁偵探 , 科學實驗王 , 哈利波特 , 東野圭吾 , x尋寶探… , PYTH… , 楓之谷大… ,

回檢索結果

放入書櫃

列印

E-mail

匯出

A debate on God and morality :what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /

作者 : Craig, William Lane. , Wielenberg, Erik J.,1972- ,(Erik Joseph), , Johnson, Adam Lloyd.

出版社 : Routledge,

出版年 : 2020

ISBN：0367135647|9780367135652|0367135655|9780367135645

3 分

三民圖書查詢

館藏(1)
書目資訊
心得(0)
機讀格式
標籤

典藏館：

年代號：

卷號：

僅顯示在架

查詢

排序

條碼號	典藏館	目前所在館	索書號	館藏狀態	資料類型	附件	預約人數	備註	預約
SRRC20103208	新總館3F分區資源中心-知識性	新總館3F分區資源中心-知識性	EKN 170.42 C886 2020	在架	資源中心知識性西文書		0		預約

書名： A debate on God and morality :what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /

紀錄類型：書目-語言資料,印刷品: 單行本

正題名[資料類型標示]/作者： A debate on God and morality :William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson.

其他題名： what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /

其他題名： What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?

作者： Craig, William Lane.

其他作者： Wielenberg, Erik J.(Erik Joseph),

出版者： New York, NY :Routledge,c2020.

面頁冊數： xii, 234 p. ;23 cm.

標題： God.

ISBN ： 9780367135652

發表心得

列印複製

LEADER 02377cam a2200277 a 4500
001 1095942
008 210930s2020 nyu e b 001 0 eng d
010 $a 2020010395
020 $a9780367135652$q(pbk.) :$cGBP32.99
020 $a0367135655$q(pbk.) :$cGBP32.99
020 $a9780367135645$q(hbk.)
020 $a0367135647$q(hbk.)
035 $aNO000212293
037 $b公共圖書館臺南分區資源中心
040 $aDLC$beng$eaacr2$cDLC$dTWTNM
041 0 $aeng
050 00$aBJ1031$b.C73 2020
082 00$a170/.42$222
090 $a臺南市立圖書館
100 1 $aCraig, William Lane.
245 12$aA debate on God and morality :$bwhat is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /$cWilliam Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson.
246 30$aWhat is the best account of objective moral values and duties?
260 $aNew York, NY :$bRoutledge,$cc2020.
300 $axii, 234 p. ;$c23 cm.
504 $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520 $a"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other. Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism. Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms."--Provided by publisher.
650 0$aGod.
650 0$aTheism.
650 0$aAtheism.
650 0$aMoral realism.
650 0$aEthics.
653 $a知識性
653 $a多元學習
700 1 $aWielenberg, Erik J.$q(Erik Joseph),$d1972-
700 1 $aJohnson, Adam Lloyd.

LEADER 02377cam a2200277 a 4500
001 1095942
008 210930s2020    nyu    e b    001 0 eng d
010   $a  2020010395
020   $a9780367135652$q(pbk.) :$cGBP32.99
020   $a0367135655$q(pbk.) :$cGBP32.99
020   $a9780367135645$q(hbk.)
020   $a0367135647$q(hbk.)
035   $aNO000212293
037   $b公共圖書館臺南分區資源中心
040   $aDLC$beng$eaacr2$cDLC$dTWTNM
041 0 $aeng
050 00$aBJ1031$b.C73 2020
082 00$a170/.42$222
090   $a臺南市立圖書館
100 1 $aCraig, William Lane.
245 12$aA debate on God and morality :$bwhat is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /$cWilliam Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg ; edited by Adam Lloyd Johnson.
246 30$aWhat is the best account of objective moral values and duties?
260   $aNew York, NY :$bRoutledge,$cc2020.
300   $axii, 234 p. ;$c23 cm.
504   $aIncludes bibliographical references and index.
520   $a"In 2018, William Lane Craig and Erik J. Wielenberg participated in a debate at North Carolina State University, addressing the question: "God and Morality: What is the best account of objective moral values and duties?" Craig argued that theism provides a sound foundation for objective morality whereas atheism does not. Wielenberg countered that morality can be objective even if there is no God. This book includes the full debate, as well as endnotes with extended discussions that were not included in the debate. It also includes five chapters by other philosophers who have written substantive responses to the debate - J. P. Moreland, David Baggett, Mark Linville, Wes Morriston, and Michael Huemer. The book provides crucial resources for better understanding moral realism and its dependence on, or independence from, theistic foundations. Key features a valuable debate about whether or not God is the best explanation for objective morality, bringing together theists and atheists working on the same subject who normally are not in conversation with each other.  Includes clear coverage of ontological and epistemological issues in metaethical theories, focusing on Divine Command Theory and Non-natural Robust Moral Realism.  Engaging and accessible throughout, making the book well suited for undergraduate and seminary classrooms."--Provided by publisher.
650  0$aGod.
650  0$aTheism.
650  0$aAtheism.
650  0$aMoral realism.
650  0$aEthics.
653   $a知識性
653   $a多元學習
700 1 $aWielenberg, Erik J.$q(Erik Joseph),$d1972-
700 1 $aJohnson, Adam Lloyd.

無資料

目前查詢

歷史查詢

A debate on God and morality :what is the best account of objective moral values and duties? /

館藏分佈狀況